During a recent city council meeting, Jim Hurst raised significant concerns regarding the constitutionality of a National Day of Prayer assembly held at city hall on May 2. Citing Article Two, Section Eleven of the New Mexico Constitution, Hurst argued that the event, which was not officially sanctioned by the city council, constituted a public religious service and violated the constitutional separation of church and state.

Hurst emphasized that the assembly was open to the public, featured city security, and utilized a public address system, which he argued contradicted the mayor's claim that it was a private meeting. He questioned the mayor's authority to authorize such an event at city hall, suggesting it imposed an undue burden on citizens by implicitly requiring their support for religious activities.

In contrast, council member Juan Garcia praised the city staff for their exceptional work in addressing complex community issues, particularly in housing. He highlighted a recent meeting that transformed his understanding of the challenges faced, crediting the staff's expertise and dedication for fostering positive change within the community.

The discussions reflect ongoing tensions regarding the role of government in religious activities and the importance of city staff in navigating community concerns.