During a recent government meeting, council members engaged in a robust discussion regarding the impact of urban development on small businesses and local workers. Council member Newenhouse highlighted concerns about potential displacement, emphasizing the need to support not only business owners but also employees affected by the changes in the area.

The conversation also touched on the flexibility of the street grid design, with suggestions to modify the language in proposal BR 81. One member proposed removing the term \"limited\" to allow for greater adaptability in infrastructure planning. This change could facilitate the development of bike lanes and alternative transportation options, moving away from traditional car-centric designs.

Council member Stokes expressed support for the ongoing efforts, acknowledging the complexities of the situation, particularly the differing needs of residents and workers in the area. He noted the long history of discussions surrounding this project and the unique potential it holds for the community.

Overall, the meeting underscored the importance of balancing urban development with the needs of small businesses and their employees, while also considering innovative transportation solutions.