During a recent government meeting, community members voiced their concerns regarding the Eastgate I-90 Land Use and Transportation Project, highlighting significant issues related to zoning and community engagement.

Michelle Wanamaker, a resident of Eastgate, expressed frustration over the proposed zoning changes that would allow mid-rise developments—ranging from six to ten stories—across most of Eastgate's business properties. She emphasized that this plan contradicts previous recommendations from the Eastgate I-90 Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) and King County, which advocated for concentrated growth in designated activity centers rather than neighborhood centers. Wanamaker pointed out that the recommended future land use map appears to apply a \"broad paintbrush\" approach, disregarding the careful planning and community input that had been previously established.

Wanamaker raised concerns about the potential impact of these developments on local residents, particularly those living in single-family homes adjacent to proposed mid-rise buildings. She questioned how the influx of new residents and office workers would navigate the area, noting the limited public transportation options outside the transit center.

Following Wanamaker, Pamela Johnston addressed the council, advocating for increased outreach and engagement with the community during the planning process. She highlighted the lack of opportunities for public input following the release of the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), suggesting that more inclusive communication would enhance community participation and understanding of the comp plan.

Both speakers underscored the importance of thoughtful planning and community involvement in shaping the future of Eastgate, calling for a reconsideration of the proposed zoning changes and improved outreach efforts to ensure that all voices are heard in the decision-making process.