Residents of the Pear Blossom subdivision voiced strong opposition during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed development of eleven two-story homes adjacent to their properties. Concerns were primarily centered around issues of density, traffic, and the existing sewage system.

One resident highlighted the lack of transitional density in the proposed plan, arguing that the introduction of multiple family homes would significantly impact the neighborhood's character and strain local resources, particularly the sewage system, which has functioned adequately for the past two decades. The resident expressed frustration over previous discussions with developers, claiming their concerns had been ignored.

Another resident, Kyle Armstrong, raised alarms about the proposed development's proximity to the existing sewage infrastructure, noting that the plans appeared to place homes directly over the drain field. He questioned the feasibility of the development without disrupting the current sewage system, which has been maintained by residents for years.

Further complicating matters, Armstrong pointed out that the proposed road improvements were unclear and seemed insufficient to handle the expected increase in traffic. He emphasized that the only exit from the new development would funnel onto Meridian Road, which is already known for congestion during peak hours.

Sergey Kashubin, another resident, echoed these sentiments, urging the council to reconsider the development's design to better address existing community concerns. He emphasized the importance of maintaining the neighborhood's character and ensuring that infrastructure, particularly sewage and road access, is adequately planned.

Aaron Furman, representing another segment of the community, reiterated worries about the sewer system's capacity to handle the new development. He noted discrepancies in meeting minutes from a previous neighborhood meeting, which failed to capture critical discussions about the sewage system, further complicating the residents' ability to address their concerns effectively.

Overall, the meeting underscored a community deeply invested in preserving their neighborhood's integrity while navigating the complexities of new development. Residents expressed a willingness to collaborate with developers but insisted that their concerns regarding infrastructure and density must be addressed before any plans move forward.