In a recent Newark City Council meeting, discussions centered around the proposed sale of city-owned property to the Urban League of Essex County, a matter stemming from a 2014 settlement agreement involving PSE&G, the Urban League, and the city. The deputy mayor presented the item, emphasizing its alignment with the long-standing agreement.

However, the proposal sparked significant public outcry, with several speakers questioning the Urban League's effectiveness and accountability over the past decade. Critics expressed frustration over the perceived lack of benefits to local residents, arguing that the Urban League has failed to deliver on promises of low to moderate income housing. One speaker highlighted the disparity between the support given to developers and the needs of the community, questioning why the council prioritizes agreements made years ago while neglecting current resident needs.

Concerns were raised about the transparency of property transfers, with accusations that city-owned properties are often sold to developers without adequate public input or adherence to regulations. Speakers called for a moratorium on new developments until the city can ensure that local residents benefit from such transactions.

Supporters of the Urban League defended the organization, noting its role in providing community services, including workshops and educational programs. They clarified that the property in question is intended for the construction of a new community center, which would enhance the Urban League's capacity to serve the community.

Despite these defenses, the overwhelming sentiment from the public was one of skepticism regarding the Urban League's past performance and the council's commitment to prioritizing the needs of Newark residents. The meeting concluded with a call for greater accountability and transparency in the handling of city-owned properties and economic incentives.