In a recent Newport city commission meeting, discussions centered around the potential establishment of medical cannabis dispensaries in the area, highlighting a mix of support and opposition among officials and community members.

The conversation began with inquiries about the selection process for dispensaries, which is reportedly determined by a lottery system that allocates licenses geographically across the state. Officials noted that if selected, they would have the authority to choose which dispensary to permit in their locality. However, concerns were raised regarding the regulatory fees associated with these dispensaries, with officials expressing uncertainty about what constitutes \"reasonable\" fees under the new program.

Commissioner Ken Recton voiced strong opposition to the initiative, drawing parallels between current cannabis sales and historical issues with unregulated medicine distribution. He criticized the lack of oversight in medical cannabis dispensaries, arguing that they do not ensure proper dosing or safety, unlike traditional pharmacies. Recton expressed skepticism about the community's desire for such establishments, stating, \"I’m not sure that this is what our city and our citizens want.\"

Public comments reflected a range of opinions. Charles Williams, a disabled veteran and Newport resident, shared his personal struggles with pain management and expressed support for medical cannabis, emphasizing the need for alternatives to opioids. Conversely, other residents, including business owner Jerry Peluso and local resident Karen Minzner, voiced their opposition, citing concerns about the health implications of cannabis use and the lack of scientific support for its benefits.

The meeting concluded with a vote on advancing the legislation, which saw a split decision among commissioners. While Recton voted against it, Commissioners Radwansky and Smith Morrow, along with Mayor Caduli, supported the initiative. The commission also adopted the Covington Newport bicycle transportation plan, indicating a broader agenda of community development alongside the contentious cannabis discussions.