In a recent government meeting, officials discussed proposed fee increases for business licenses, with a focus on the impact on massage establishments. The proposed increases, which include a $52 rise over three years for general business licenses, were characterized by some members as negligible. However, concerns were raised about the implications for small businesses still recovering from the pandemic.

Supervisor Hume expressed reservations about the fee increases, arguing that they could be seen as a form of gatekeeping rather than facilitating business growth. He emphasized that businesses already contribute significantly through various taxes and questioned the necessity of further cost recovery measures. Hume also noted that the Tri Chambers had not been consulted regarding the potential effects on their members.

In contrast, Supervisor Serna supported the motion, highlighting the need to distinguish between compliant businesses and those that do not follow regulations. He acknowledged the historical context of fee holidays and the necessity of recovering costs that had not been addressed for several years.

Supervisor Frost echoed concerns about the burden on small businesses, describing the fees as a hidden tax that ultimately affects consumers. She expressed her ideological opposition to the increases but acknowledged that the motion was likely to pass.

The motion to approve the fee increases ultimately carried, with Supervisors Frost and Hume voting against it. The discussion underscored the ongoing tension between cost recovery for government services and the financial realities faced by local businesses.