In a heated government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed development plan that they argue prioritizes corporate interests over the needs of local residents. Critics, including several residents and activists, accused city officials of facilitating a \"corrupt\" scheme that would displace vulnerable populations in favor of wealthy developers, particularly targeting the plans associated with billionaire Graham Weston.

During the meeting, speakers highlighted the potential demolition of 381 affordable housing units, which would displace numerous families, predominantly from Black and Brown communities. They expressed outrage over the allocation of public funds to support a project that they believe serves only a select few, while the city struggles with limited resources. One resident, Sarah Honeycutt, emphasized the moral implications of the council's decisions, urging officials to consider the human cost of their actions and to invest in the community rather than in corporate bailouts.

Luis Alvarado, another resident, echoed these sentiments, arguing that the proposed financial assistance for displaced families was insufficient and failed to account for the true costs of relocation. He urged council members to reconsider their approach and to prioritize the well-being of individuals over corporate profits.

Activists from organizations like Pueblo Verofet also condemned the plan, framing it as a backroom deal that undermines democratic processes and disregards the voices of constituents. They called for a rejection of the stadium deal, asserting that it would exacerbate gentrification and further marginalize the working poor in San Antonio.

As the council deliberates on the proposal, community members remain vigilant, demanding transparency and accountability from their elected officials. The outcome of this meeting could significantly impact the future of affordable housing and the lives of many residents in the city.