In a recent city council meeting, residents voiced strong opinions regarding the proposed development of a new baseball stadium in San Antonio, highlighting concerns about community impact, transparency, and the potential for displacement.

Local resident and neighborhood association member expressed support for the stadium but raised alarms about the ongoing challenges faced by the community, particularly regarding safety and drug trafficking issues. He emphasized the need for improved services and security, especially near local schools, and urged city officials to ensure that the new development benefits existing businesses and residents rather than exacerbating current problems.

Keith Smith, a long-time season ticket holder, echoed the sentiment that a new stadium could revitalize the area, drawing parallels to successful stadium developments in other cities. However, he acknowledged the importance of ensuring that the project generates tangible benefits for the local economy.

Conversely, Philip Adcock, a downtown resident, articulated grave concerns about the lack of transparent planning and the potential for displacement of current residents. He called for more inclusive discussions regarding relocation plans and emphasized the need for affordable housing to accompany any new developments. Adcock warned that prioritizing tourist revenue over community needs could lead to the erasure of the city’s cultural fabric.

Antonio Diaz added to the discourse by criticizing the ongoing gentrification in the city, describing it as a form of violence against long-standing residents. He urged for more consideration of low-income individuals in the planning process, advocating for their right to remain in their homes.

Donald De Gallado from Clearing House CDFI expressed support for the stadium project, emphasizing the importance of local economic development and the need for affordable housing solutions. He highlighted the potential for local vendors to benefit from the new stadium.

The meeting underscored a significant divide between those who see the stadium as a catalyst for growth and those who fear it will lead to further displacement and loss of community identity. As discussions continue, residents are calling for more engagement and accountability from city officials to ensure that the needs of the community are prioritized in the development process.