In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a variance request for a property at 20 Water Street, which has remained vacant and deteriorating for over a decade. The board addressed concerns regarding the proposed construction of a second-floor deck, which would require an 11-foot, 9-inch setback variance from the standard 25 feet.

David Murphy, a resident from across the street, voiced his support for the variance, highlighting the property's long-standing issues, including mold and its status as an eyesore in the neighborhood. He expressed optimism about the new owners' plans to restore the home, suggesting that any development would be an improvement over the current state.

The board members engaged in a thorough evaluation of the variance request, considering factors such as the potential impact on the neighborhood and whether the requested variance was substantial. They concluded that the proposed deck would not adversely affect the character of the area, given the steep embankment behind the property, which mitigates any potential negative effects.

The board unanimously agreed that the variance request was not substantial and that the difficulties faced by the applicants were self-created, a common scenario in such cases. However, they emphasized that this did not detract from the merits of the application. Ultimately, the board determined that the variance was the minimum necessary to allow for the proposed construction while preserving the neighborhood's character.

The meeting concluded with a motion to close the public hearing, and the board prepared to move forward with a resolution regarding the variance request.