During a recent city council meeting in Huntington Beach, significant concerns were raised regarding a multimillion-dollar agreement related to the Pacific Air Show. Critics, including former executives and long-time residents, expressed alarm over the lack of thorough financial analysis prior to entering the contract, which they described as a \"40-year no-bid contract\" that could cost taxpayers up to $32 million.

One speaker highlighted discrepancies in an economic impact report touted by city officials, claiming it misrepresented benefits to Huntington Beach by including regional data that primarily benefited neighboring cities. The report's assertion of a $120 million economic impact was criticized as misleading, with claims that it lacked a specific timeframe and could refer to economic activity occurring anywhere in the U.S.

Concerns were also raised about the city's financial responsibilities under the agreement, including costs for permits, police, fire services, and beach maintenance, which could escalate over the decades. Residents questioned why the Pacific Air Show had not pursued claims against the oil company responsible for a recent oil spill, suggesting that the city should not bear the financial burden of the settlement.

Calls for transparency were echoed throughout the meeting, with one resident proposing a new ordinance to ensure that settlement terms are publicly disclosed without the need for unanimous council approval. The sentiment among speakers was clear: there is a pressing need for accountability and a reevaluation of the agreement to protect taxpayer interests.