In a recent court session, the defense attorney for Jonathan Menard presented a compelling argument centered on the lack of concrete evidence regarding the circumstances surrounding the death of Kayla, a pregnant woman whose body was discovered in Louisiana. The attorney emphasized the absence of definitive proof about where the death occurred, stating, \"We do not know where the death occurred... We don't know if the death occurred in Beaumont or if it occurred in Orange County or if it occurred in Vinton.\"

The defense highlighted significant gaps in the prosecution's case, particularly regarding the autopsy report, which reportedly contained no results related to blood or tissue syndromes. The attorney argued that the inability to establish the exact location and cause of death creates reasonable doubt, a critical element in the legal proceedings. \"Because we don't know those things, your oath requires you to follow the law,\" the attorney urged the jury.

As the trial progressed, Timothy Ledoux, a witness and truck driver, testified about his discovery of what appeared to be human remains while working in the area where Kayla's body was later found. Ledoux described seeing a bone protruding from the ground, which he identified as a human foot. He reported the finding to his supervisor, who subsequently contacted law enforcement.

The court also heard from Melissa Derplinger, a forensic investigator with extensive experience, who provided insights into the investigative process. Derplinger's qualifications and training were established, underscoring her role in the ongoing investigation.

The defense's strategy hinges on the assertion that the prosecution has not met the burden of proof necessary to convict Menard, as critical details surrounding the case remain unresolved. The trial continues as both sides prepare to present further evidence and testimonies.