During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around the implications of a Court of Appeals ruling regarding a proposed tax measure, known as Prop. 490. Mayor Graham expressed a differing interpretation of the ruling, emphasizing that the court clarified the city's stance on the tax, which they deemed a new tax rather than a reduction of an existing one. He highlighted the importance of the ballot measure's language, asserting that it accurately reflects the tax's immediate effectiveness following the expiration of a previous tax.

Council members raised questions about the financial implications of defending Prop. 490, specifically inquiring about legal fees paid to the law firm Sherman Howard. While the exact figures were not disclosed, it was acknowledged that the city has incurred costs related to the lawsuit, with payments reviewed by Deputy Lori Davis. The council also discussed the extensive hours city staff have dedicated to both the preparation and defense of the ballot measure, although specific hour counts were not provided.

As the meeting progressed, one council member voiced concerns about making last-minute changes to the ballot language without allowing residents adequate time for review and input. This prompted a motion to remove certain references from the proposed language, reflecting a desire to ensure transparency and community engagement in the decision-making process. The council's deliberations underscore the ongoing complexities surrounding the tax measure and the importance of clear communication with constituents.