During a recent government meeting, community concerns regarding air quality and environmental safety were at the forefront, particularly in relation to the Gallo glass plant's operations in Modesto, a historically disadvantaged area. John X. Motako, a representative from the Grayson Neighborhood Council, raised alarms about the plant's emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), questioning the adequacy of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution District's assessments and the implications of a negative declaration regarding air quality.

Motako emphasized the need for transparency and accountability, urging the county to revisit a 1991 settlement agreement related to the plant's operations. He expressed skepticism about the claims that the project would result in 7,000 fewer truck trips, highlighting the community's ongoing struggles with air pollution and environmental hazards.

Concerns were also voiced about the cleanliness of properties owned by Gallo, with Motako insisting that abandoned lots should be maintained to prevent fire hazards. Gallo representatives responded, assuring that they conduct regular clean-ups and are responsive to community complaints, although they acknowledged challenges posed by homelessness in the area.

The meeting also addressed the need for better communication with the predominantly Spanish-speaking community, as some residents noted that notifications about the project were only sent in English. This raised questions about inclusivity and the effectiveness of outreach efforts.

Despite the concerns raised, the board ultimately expressed support for the project, citing the potential reduction in truck traffic as a positive outcome. The motion to approve the project passed with a 5-0 vote, with board members encouraging ongoing dialogue between Gallo and community representatives to address environmental and safety issues moving forward.