In a recent government meeting, officials discussed a significant amendment proposal for Gallo Glass Company, which seeks to rezone 24 parcels in Modesto's airport neighborhood from single-family residential to plan development. This change aims to facilitate the establishment of an outdoor palletized glass storage facility, with plans for a future 150,000 square foot warehouse for indoor glass storage.

The five-acre site, currently vacant except for two unoccupied homes and a paved parking lot, is surrounded by various developments, including the existing Gallo Glass campus and residential areas. The project intends to operate year-round, primarily for the storage of bulk glass containers, with no manufacturing activities planned on-site. The facility will be enclosed by a six-foot chain link fence and will include landscaping to mitigate visual and noise impacts.

Concerns were raised by local residents regarding potential dust from glass storage, noise, and increased traffic in the area. Four residents expressed opposition, citing worries about the expansion of industrial uses in a residential zone and the impact on nearby Mono Park. In response, project representatives clarified that the facility would not generate glass shards or significant noise, as all glass would arrive and depart in shrink-wrapped packaging.

Traffic issues were also highlighted, particularly regarding the proposed access points for trucks, which could interfere with existing pedestrian and bike paths. Staff from the Department of Public Works emphasized the need for careful planning to prevent congestion and ensure safety for non-motorized users.

The project has undergone a thorough review process, including an air quality assessment that concluded it would have less than significant impacts. The proposal aligns with the city’s general plan and zoning ordinances, with development standards in place to address landscaping, lighting, and building height.

During the public hearing, opposition was voiced by attorney Nick Jensen, representing California Rural Legal Assistance, who argued that the project conflicts with a 1991 settlement agreement regarding community planning in the airport neighborhood. Jensen also raised concerns about the exclusion of the area from potential high-density housing developments, suggesting that the project could exacerbate segregation.

As the planning commission continues to evaluate the proposal, the discussions highlight the ongoing tension between industrial development and residential community interests in Modesto.