In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the potential impact of a letter from the Point No Point Treaty Council on four proposed projects seeking trust line transfers from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The council expressed opposition to these projects, citing uncertainties about the protection of treaty rights, a critical issue given the historical context of tribal treaty rights not being upheld in various state-funded land programs.

Participants in the meeting, including members of the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), emphasized their commitment to upholding treaty rights and indicated a willingness to incorporate necessary measures into the projects. A collaborative effort was initiated, involving discussions with representatives from the Point No Point Treaty Council, Jamestown S'Klallam, and Port Gamble S'Klallam tribes, alongside DNR officials.

Key figures in the discussions, including Mark, Phil Hunsucker, and Tammy Pokorny, worked together to devise a plan to address the concerns raised by the treaty council. Hunsucker, in particular, was acknowledged for his dedication, having spent considerable time over the weekend preparing documentation to facilitate the next steps in the project evaluation process.

The meeting underscored the importance of ensuring that tribal treaty rights are respected and integrated into future planning, as stakeholders seek to navigate the complexities of these projects while maintaining a commitment to indigenous rights and collaboration. Further details on the proposed plan are expected to be discussed in upcoming meetings.