Concerns over the proposed height and placement of a new cell phone tower dominated discussions at a recent government meeting, with residents voicing strong objections based on aesthetic, property value, and public health issues.

Local resident John Rubenetti, whose property is directly behind the proposed tower site, expressed his worries about the tower's height, which is set to reach 50 feet. He highlighted that the elevated nature of the land would make the structure even more imposing, significantly impacting his view and property value. Rubenetti urged the council to adhere to existing ordinances regarding height restrictions, emphasizing that the tower's placement is not only disruptive but also surrounded by residential properties, which he argued should be taken into account.

Another resident, Steve Collins, echoed these sentiments, questioning the necessity of the tower's height and suggesting that a lower structure would be less intrusive. He criticized the visual impact of the tower, likening it to an \"eyesore,\" and called for alternatives that would minimize disruption to the neighborhood.

The meeting also touched on the lack of local ordinances governing cell tower placement, with some municipalities having stricter regulations than others. This inconsistency has raised concerns among residents about the potential for decreased property values and the overall aesthetic of the community.

As the public hearing concluded, the council indicated that they would seek further clarification from technical experts regarding the height requirements and the rationale behind the proposed tower specifications. The discussions reflect a growing tension between the need for improved telecommunications infrastructure and the preservation of community standards and property values.