In a recent government meeting, community members expressed significant concerns regarding a proposed $59 million purchase of a bridge, emphasizing the need for comprehensive information and transparency before any decisions are made. The discussions highlighted various alternatives and the potential financial implications for taxpayers.

One resident raised questions about the feasibility of allowing Wayne County to buy the bridge, citing their history of neglecting repairs. The idea of implementing an emergency plan for a temporary bridge was also discussed, with suggestions to stage materials at the airport to expedite the process. The possibility of constructing a new land bridge or a causeway bridge was considered, particularly in light of changing traffic patterns.

Mickey Bartlett, another attendee, stressed the importance of providing professionally prepared written materials to clarify the financial impact on residents, including potential tax increases. He urged the government to outline the due diligence process and next steps clearly, as many community members felt uninformed about the proposal.

Linda Kalash echoed these sentiments, warning that the financial burden of the bridge purchase could disproportionately affect some residents. She called for a broader discussion on the long-term costs associated with the acquisition.

Bill Heil supported the bridge purchase, arguing that it would provide essential infrastructure during repairs of existing bridges. He suggested that any potential cost adjustments should not come at the expense of essential services like police and fire protection.

Frank Garner cautioned against rushing the proposal to a ballot in November, especially with upcoming changes in the governing board, indicating that more time for deliberation and community input is necessary.

Overall, the meeting underscored a community grappling with the implications of a significant financial decision, seeking clarity and assurance that all options have been thoroughly explored.