Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Residents rally against racetrack noise and property value decline

August 19, 2024 | Cannon Falls, Goodhue County, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents rally against racetrack noise and property value decline
Residents of Cannon Falls voiced strong opposition to the proposed racetrack during a recent city council meeting, citing concerns over noise pollution and its potential impact on property values. The discussions highlighted the long-standing issue of noise emanating from the racetrack, which residents claim has already led to a decline in property values on the west side of town, ultimately affecting the local tax base.

Local resident Furlan acknowledged the noise complaints, noting that calls to the police regarding disturbances have been reported from various areas, not just the west side. He urged the council to consider alternative activities that could be hosted at the fairgrounds, such as flea markets or additional horse racing, which would not generate the same level of noise.

Furlan also raised concerns about the racetrack operating without proper permits, suggesting that the council's approval of a text amendment could lead to further expansions and requests that might disrupt the community. He referenced past incidents involving motorcycle events that were quickly shut down, questioning what future activities might arise if the racetrack is allowed to continue.

Another resident, Jan Fenner, read a letter from fellow westside resident Kurt Beisel, who expressed frustration over being misled about the noise levels associated with go-kart racing. Beisel's letter detailed a petition signed by over 100 residents opposing the racetrack, emphasizing that the Cannon Valley Fair is not a county fair and should adhere to local zoning regulations.

Beisel's letter also pointed out that the racetrack, Cannon River Raceway LLC, is a separate entity from the fair and must comply with state and local ordinances. He argued that an environmental review should have been conducted before construction began, as required by law for tracks built after 1996.

The residents' collective concerns underscore a significant community pushback against the racetrack, with calls for the council to reconsider its operations and the potential long-term implications for the town.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Minnesota articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI