F 35 noise sparks community outcry for change
August 12, 2024 | Burlington City, Chittenden County, Vermont
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
In a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong concerns regarding the impact of F-35 fighter jets stationed at Burlington Airport. The discussions highlighted the significant noise pollution and its detrimental effects on local residents, particularly children and vulnerable populations, including refugees.
Megan Emery, a former city counselor, recounted the emotional toll on families living near the airport, sharing personal anecdotes of children distressed by the noise from the F-35s. She emphasized that the community's sentiment has shifted since a 2018 nonbinding referendum, with many residents now advocating for a change in the military's mission in the area.
James Markley criticized the F-35's compatibility with urban life, arguing that the aircraft was not designed for densely populated areas. He pointed out that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established noise regulations that the F-35s violate, suggesting that civilian interests should take precedence over military operations.
Jean Seisani, a former housing inspector, revealed her involvement in reviewing extensive communications from the U.S. Air Force, which she claims contained misleading information regarding the basing of the F-35s. She raised concerns about the aircraft's operational readiness, citing a recent statement from Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin that only 29% of F-35s are mission-capable.
Community members also highlighted the psychological impact of the noise on refugees, with Irene Karubo Webster sharing how the sound of jets can trigger traumatic memories for those who have fled war-torn countries. She called for measures to address the excessive noise, framing it as a matter of dignity and safety for all residents.
The meeting underscored a growing demand for local leaders to reconsider the military's presence in Burlington and to prioritize the well-being of the community over military interests. As discussions continue, the implications of the F-35 basing remain a contentious issue for residents advocating for change.
Megan Emery, a former city counselor, recounted the emotional toll on families living near the airport, sharing personal anecdotes of children distressed by the noise from the F-35s. She emphasized that the community's sentiment has shifted since a 2018 nonbinding referendum, with many residents now advocating for a change in the military's mission in the area.
James Markley criticized the F-35's compatibility with urban life, arguing that the aircraft was not designed for densely populated areas. He pointed out that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has established noise regulations that the F-35s violate, suggesting that civilian interests should take precedence over military operations.
Jean Seisani, a former housing inspector, revealed her involvement in reviewing extensive communications from the U.S. Air Force, which she claims contained misleading information regarding the basing of the F-35s. She raised concerns about the aircraft's operational readiness, citing a recent statement from Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin that only 29% of F-35s are mission-capable.
Community members also highlighted the psychological impact of the noise on refugees, with Irene Karubo Webster sharing how the sound of jets can trigger traumatic memories for those who have fled war-torn countries. She called for measures to address the excessive noise, framing it as a matter of dignity and safety for all residents.
The meeting underscored a growing demand for local leaders to reconsider the military's presence in Burlington and to prioritize the well-being of the community over military interests. As discussions continue, the implications of the F-35 basing remain a contentious issue for residents advocating for change.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting