During a recent government meeting, Councilman Drake expressed strong disagreement with the chair regarding the treatment of employees within the government, emphasizing that many are underpaid and urging immediate action to rectify this situation. He highlighted the need for the council to move beyond discussions and take tangible steps to ensure fair compensation for employees across various departments, including planning, public works, and parks.
The council also addressed several bills, with multiple proposals being held for further discussion. Notably, Bill number 160 and Bill number 161 were perfected, while Bill number 162 faced significant scrutiny due to legal concerns. Council members raised alarms about the bill's legality, with one member stating that the number of legal infirmities in the legislation exceeded the bill's content. This prompted calls for either dropping the bill or holding it until a legally sound substitute could be drafted.
Councilwoman Clancy and Councilman Trachis echoed concerns about the procedural integrity of moving forward with a bill that required substantial revisions. They emphasized the importance of ensuring that any legislation presented is legally sound and properly vetted by the county counselor's office.
As the meeting progressed, the council agreed to hold Bill number 162 for further review, indicating a commitment to thorough legislative processes and the necessity of obtaining legal opinions before proceeding with potentially flawed legislation. The discussions underscored the council's ongoing efforts to balance timely action with the need for legal and procedural diligence in governance.