In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed high-rise development at 842 California Street in San Francisco. The project, which aims to add 33 residential units, has sparked intense debate among local residents and city officials, primarily due to its potential impact on the neighborhood's character and existing views.

The project sponsor, Cas Calder Smith, presented the architectural plans, emphasizing the building's design as a contribution to the iconic California Street. However, the proposal has faced backlash from community members who argue that the height of the building—reportedly reaching 100 feet—would obstruct views and overshadow nearby historic structures, including the University Club, which has been a part of the neighborhood since 1908.

Residents voiced their concerns during the public comment period, highlighting issues such as the building's height, potential noise pollution, and the overall aesthetic mismatch with the surrounding architecture. Katherine Anderson, a local resident, expressed that the new structure would create a \"wall\" in front of the University Club's balconies, affecting events held there. Erica Frick, another resident, criticized the project for its lack of net gain in affordable housing, noting that the area already has a surplus of unoccupied units.

Several speakers pointed out that the proposed development takes advantage of the state’s density bonus law, which allows for increased building heights in exchange for including affordable housing units. Critics argue that this law is being misused, as the project does not adequately address the community's needs and could further exacerbate the oversupply of housing in the area.

The meeting also revealed concerns about the potential decrease in property values due to the new construction. Bob Cohen, a resident of the neighborhood, shared that his property value had already dropped significantly, attributing this decline to the oversupply of housing and the unattractive design of nearby developments.

Commissioners acknowledged the residents' concerns but also noted the challenges posed by state regulations that limit local control over such projects. The discussion concluded with a call for further examination of the project's implications for the community, as the planning commission weighs the balance between development and preserving the character of the historic neighborhood.