During a recent city council meeting in Norco, discussions centered around the staffing of public works inspectors, highlighting the potential benefits of hiring union members for these positions. The local union, representing the public worker inspector role, argued that filling the position with a union member would enhance service delivery to the city, as these individuals possess a better understanding of local infrastructure, codes, and compliance requirements.

Currently, city employees are assisting contracted inspectors, which has led to inefficiencies and a lack of knowledge regarding regulations. The union emphasized that hiring internally could save the city approximately $287,000 annually compared to the current contract with Z and K, which costs $550,000. The union's proposal includes hiring two full-time inspectors, with salaries estimated at $77,000 and $86,000, plus benefits.

Support for the union's position was echoed by Luke Matson, who noted that having an in-house inspector previously led to better oversight and accountability in city projects. He expressed concerns about the current state of inspections, suggesting that the absence of dedicated inspectors has resulted in confusion and a lack of clarity regarding ongoing work in the city.

City officials responded by explaining the rationale behind contracting out inspection services. They cited difficulties in finding qualified candidates for in-house positions and the need for specialized expertise to manage increasing workloads. The city has relied on outside consultants to ensure that inspections are handled efficiently and effectively, particularly as project demands have grown.

The council's deliberations reflect a broader conversation about balancing cost savings with the need for effective local governance and oversight in public works. As the city navigates these staffing challenges, the outcome of these discussions may significantly impact the future of public works inspections in Norco.