Become a Founder Member Now!

Neighbors Rally to Preserve Nature Against New Development Plans

August 09, 2024 | Little Rock City, Pulaski County, Arkansas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Neighbors Rally to Preserve Nature Against New Development Plans
In a recent government meeting, the preliminary plat for the Water's Edge Phase Three residential development was discussed, proposing the subdivision of 38.32 acres into 149 single-family lots. The development, which will include three phases, aims to provide an average lot size of 6,000 square feet, with dimensions of 50 feet by 120 feet. Shady Brook Drive is set to be extended to connect with White Oak Trails, with plans for a secondary access point from Sunshine Drive in the future.

The applicant has requested a variance from the city's subdivision ordinance, which mandates a minimum lot width of 75 feet for corner lots, seeking approval for 70-foot wide corner lots instead. City staff expressed support for this request, noting that the proposed subdivision is not expected to adversely impact surrounding properties.

However, the proposal faced opposition from local residents, represented by Dr. Kenneth Jones, president of the Water's Edge Neighborhood Association. Jones articulated concerns about the environmental impact of the development, emphasizing the importance of preserving the existing natural landscape, which is home to various wildlife, including deer and owls. He urged for the maintenance of the tree line and suggested that a property owners association be established to ensure the upkeep of the new development.

Residents also expressed a desire for increased green space between the new lots and existing homes, as well as a barrier to prevent access to their properties from the new development. The community's commitment to preserving the aesthetic beauty of the area and its natural habitats was a central theme in their opposition.

The meeting concluded with the applicant reserving time to respond to the concerns raised, indicating that discussions will continue as the project moves forward.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Arkansas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI