During a recent government meeting, officials discussed proposals for roofing work on the courthouse, revealing a close bid comparison and the need for further consultation. The two bids received for the project differ by approximately $12,000, with one suggesting an overlay on the existing roof and the other proposing a complete removal and replacement.

To aid in the decision-making process, the board consulted an engineer and architect from GMC in Dothan, Alabama. After assessing the situation, the engineer recommended that the board reconsult with a company they have previously worked with, as neither of the current bids fully addressed the necessary repairs. The engineer noted specific issues with the parapets and gutters that require attention.

Commissioners expressed concerns about the bids, emphasizing the importance of selecting a contractor with the right expertise. One bid specializes in standing seam roofs, while the other has more experience with membrane systems. The board is considering negotiating with both companies to refine their proposals based on the engineer's insights.

As discussions progressed, some commissioners suggested that if the board decides to pursue a different direction, it may be prudent to reject the current bids to allow for a fresh approach. The meeting underscored the complexities involved in the roofing project and the need for careful evaluation to ensure the courthouse receives the best possible solution.