Citizens demand accountability in water supply decision

In a recent government meeting, citizens expressed significant concerns regarding the city council's decision to withdraw from the Pickens Regional Joint Water System and instead rely on Greenville Water for their water supply. Community members voiced their frustrations, emphasizing a perceived lack of transparency and representation in the council's decision-making process.

One resident highlighted that many citizens feel unheard and urged the council to reconsider its approach, suggesting that using Greenville Water as a temporary solution until the completion of the Pickens Regional Joint Water Plan would be more prudent. This alternative, they argued, would allow the city to maintain control over its water supply and foster better relationships with neighboring communities, rather than becoming dependent on a larger monopoly.

Another speaker, Pam Winters, raised concerns about the legal advice that influenced the council's decision, questioning its impartiality and the potential risks associated with the current course of action. She argued that the joint water system should not be dismissed as duplicative, as it would provide a state-of-the-art facility with community representation, unlike the arrangement with Greenville Water.

Jessica Merrill echoed these sentiments, questioning the council's motivations and the long-term implications of their decisions. She pointed out that the current water treatment plant could continue operating until the new facility is completed, suggesting that there is no immediate need to rush into a contract with Greenville Water.

Overall, the meeting underscored a growing discontent among residents regarding the council's water supply strategy, with calls for greater collaboration and consideration of community voices in future decisions. The discussions reflect a critical moment for the city as it navigates its water supply challenges and seeks to rebuild trust with its constituents.