In a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opinions regarding a proposed development on the Concordia property, currently zoned for residential use. The discussions highlighted a divide among residents about the suitability of the location for new housing.

One speaker emphasized the importance of considering the long-term well-being of all residents, advocating for the preservation of green spaces in the area. They argued that while development can bring benefits, it should not come at the expense of existing community resources and environmental health.

Matthew Bekner, a local resident, raised concerns about the specific choice of the Concordia site for the proposed housing project. He questioned the necessity of this location, suggesting that alternative sites, such as the old middle school property, might be more appropriate for development. Bekner expressed apprehension about potential contamination issues from a nearby dump site, warning that rushing the project could lead to serious health risks for residents.

He urged decision-makers to consider the implications of placing cluster housing in areas that may not be suitable, citing the presence of a ravine and the need to maintain natural habitats. Bekner concluded by advocating for a more thoughtful approach to development, emphasizing that while the community is not opposed to new housing, it must be done responsibly and in suitable locations.

The meeting underscored the community's desire for careful planning and consideration of environmental impacts in future developments.