During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed zoning change by the Ravenna development, citing concerns over preservation, community agreements, and environmental impact.

Cindy Livingston, speaking on behalf of a resident unable to attend due to a medical emergency, highlighted a historical agreement that designated certain areas as natural open space or golf course property, urging the commissioners to uphold this commitment. She argued that the proposed changes would violate previously established rights and negatively impact both local residents and golfers.

Bridget Epp, co-chair of Save Our Rocks, echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that the proposed amendments contradict the preservation criteria established in Douglas County's planning policies. Epp urged the commissioners to deny the request, stressing the importance of maintaining the integrity of the planned development.

Barbara Buslawski, a board member of the local homeowners association, raised concerns about the proposed easement changes for a water tower, arguing that the developers should honor the original agreements made when they purchased the property. She also questioned the proposed home sizes, suggesting that they may not align with the existing neighborhood character.

Slade Putnam, a long-time resident, expressed his belief that the development would significantly disrupt the community, doubling traffic and harming local wildlife habitats. He urged the commissioners to consider the long-term implications of the development, questioning whether the potential profits justify the environmental and social costs.

James McCord, another resident, reflected on the past collaborative efforts between the community and Ravenna, contrasting them with the current proposal, which he described as a \"win-lose situation\" favoring the developer at the expense of local residents. He called for greater consideration of community needs and values in the decision-making process.

The meeting underscored a strong community sentiment against the proposed changes, with residents advocating for the preservation of their neighborhood's character and environmental integrity. The commissioners are expected to deliberate on the proposal in the coming weeks, weighing the community's concerns against the developers' interests.