In a recent government meeting, officials outlined a significant infrastructure project aimed at enhancing the city's water supply system. The project, which is set to be recommended to voters, includes the construction of a new pump station, the replacement of the reservoir's roof, and the installation of mechanical mixers to improve water quality. The estimated cost for these upgrades ranges from $8 million to $10 million, with $1 million already earmarked from the congressionally delegated spending list.

The proposed enhancements also involve realigning outdated pipes dating back to the 1867 design and making various site improvements, including security upgrades and stormwater management. There is potential for solar energy installation on the rehabilitated roof, although drinking water quality will take precedence in planning.

Officials are currently assessing the financial implications of the project, including potential rate impacts on residents. They are collaborating with water resources financing experts and exploring various funding strategies, including public bond markets and federal assistance through the WIDEO program, as state funding for wastewater projects remains limited.

In addition to infrastructure improvements, the meeting highlighted the need for an updated impact fee structure to support new developments. Officials are working with city consultants to establish a coordinated impact fee that reflects both existing and future capacity needs.

A key focus of the discussion was the affordability of water services, particularly for lower and middle-income residents. Plans are underway to enhance affordability programs, which may include income verification processes to create tiered rate structures based on household income. This initiative aims to ensure that financial burdens are equitably distributed among residents.

Looking ahead, officials anticipate presenting a resolution to the city council in January to seek approval for bond questions related to clean and drinking water projects. They emphasized that voter approval would not automatically lead to bond issuance, allowing for continued dialogue on affordability and project specifics before any financial commitments are made.