In a recent government meeting, the board addressed the claim of Claiborne Dennis, who sought $1,560,640 for 11,186 days of imprisonment stemming from a 1988 conviction for second-degree murder. The claim was met with opposition from the attorney general's office, which argued that Dennis failed to prove his innocence, a requirement under California Penal Code section 49100.

Dennis's attorney, Jeffrey Mendelmann, contended that the conviction was unjust, emphasizing that Dennis was only 16 years old at the time of the incident, which involved a single punch. Mendelmann argued that the lengthy imprisonment—34 years—was disproportionate and called for compensation, citing the moral imperative to rectify the injustice.

In contrast, Deputy Attorney General Jessica Leal presented evidence suggesting that Dennis was a key participant in a violent beating that resulted in the victim's death. She highlighted multiple witness statements and Dennis's own admissions over the years, asserting that he had previously accepted responsibility for his actions. Leal urged the board to adopt the hearing officer's recommendation to deny the claim, stating that Dennis's current assertions of innocence were undermined by his past statements made in pursuit of parole.

After deliberation, the board voted unanimously to deny Dennis's claim, concluding that he did not meet the burden of proof required to demonstrate his innocence. The decision reflects ongoing debates about justice, accountability, and the complexities surrounding claims of wrongful conviction.