Residents of a gated community expressed strong opposition during a recent government meeting regarding the proposed construction of a cell tower in their neighborhood. Concerns were raised about the potential stigma associated with the tower, which they argue would negatively impact property values in an area where homes range from $700,000 to $1.5 million.

One resident highlighted the financial implications for the community, emphasizing that the proposed site is pristine and does not conform to the surrounding uses. They argued that the tower should be placed on previously stigmatized sites rather than affecting their neighborhood, which consists of only 12 lots.

The discussion also touched on the technical aspects of the tower's height. While it was noted that the tower could potentially be extended beyond 185 feet, it was clarified that any height above this would require compliance with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations, including the installation of lighting. The applicant confirmed that they would adhere to the proposed height and safety measures, including a 60-foot fall zone to mitigate risks in the event of a collapse.

Residents expressed frustration over a lack of communication regarding the project, with one stating they were unaware of the proposal until informed by a neighbor. The applicant responded by clarifying the distances involved, noting that the nearest property owner lives approximately 1,900 feet from the proposed tower site.

The meeting concluded with a recommendation from the community to deny the application, citing concerns over property values and the appropriateness of the tower's location.