In a recent public hearing, community members expressed significant concerns regarding a proposed commercial cannabis operation by Matilda Farms in a residential zone. The meeting highlighted the tension between local residents and the expansion of cannabis cultivation in areas traditionally designated for residential use.

Residents voiced their objections, citing issues such as excessive lighting from nearby grow operations, which they claim disrupts the night sky and diminishes their quality of life. Kim Peck, a local property owner, raised alarms about the potential for increased light pollution and the possibility of grow lights being installed despite assurances of using natural lighting.

Julie Jacob, another resident, articulated her concerns about the compatibility of the proposed operation with the residential zoning classification. She argued that the presence of commercial cannabis operations undermines the intended purpose of the area, which is meant for residential development. Jacob pointed out that the existing commercial greenhouse, High Desert Relief, already poses challenges, including strong odors and potential impacts on local water resources.

The issue of water usage was a focal point of the discussion, with residents questioning the sustainability of using limited water resources for cannabis cultivation. Jacob highlighted that the Estancia Basin, from which local wells draw water, is experiencing declining water levels, raising concerns about the long-term viability of both residential and commercial water needs.

Residents also called for greater oversight and regulation of cannabis operations, questioning how the county monitors plant counts and water usage. They expressed fears that the approval of Matilda Farms could lead to further commercial expansions in their neighborhood, fundamentally altering the character of the community.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the proposed cannabis operation has sparked a broader debate about land use, community values, and the balance between commercial interests and residential quality of life. The county's decision on the matter will likely have lasting implications for the area and its residents.