In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the contentious topic of a proposed marina project, which has sparked significant public opposition. Commissioner Dave expressed gratitude to fellow commissioner Caragena for placing the marina discussion on the agenda, emphasizing the importance of community feedback in decision-making. He recounted past experiences where public sentiment shifted dramatically, leading to abrupt policy reversals, and urged his colleagues to consider the community's voice regarding the marina.

The conversation highlighted a divide among commissioners about the project's feasibility and its inclusion in the budget. Some officials argued that the feasibility study, already funded, should proceed to provide residents with the necessary information to make an informed decision. They stressed that the study would assess economic and environmental impacts, as well as potential locations for the marina.

Commissioner Skip pointed out that the 2026 budget is not yet finalized, and discussions about pulling items from it were premature. He criticized misinformation circulating in the community regarding the budget and the marina project, asserting that the feasibility study is essential for understanding the project's viability.

Another commissioner echoed the sentiment that the community should ultimately decide on the marina's future, suggesting a referendum once the feasibility study is complete. The meeting concluded with a consensus on the need for transparency and further discussion, with plans to present detailed findings from the feasibility study at the next commission meeting. The ongoing debate reflects broader concerns about fiscal responsibility and community engagement in local governance.