Residents of River Rock Lane expressed strong opposition to a proposed short-term rental (STR) license for a property at 100 River Rock Lane during a recent government meeting. The discussions highlighted ongoing concerns about noise, privacy, and community impact stemming from the property's use as a rental.
Tom Melberg, a neighbor, described the discomfort of living near the rental, noting that the property, which has been limited to 10 occupants, has historically hosted larger groups, leading to excessive noise and disturbances. He recounted instances where he had to contact the property management to address loud music and parties, emphasizing that these issues have persisted for decades.
Rob Pugh, another resident, echoed Melberg's sentiments, detailing problems such as garbage, parking congestion, and trespassing that have arisen from the STR's operation. He argued that the property’s location on a narrow road exacerbates these issues, making it difficult for neighbors to enjoy their homes. Pugh urged the board to deny the STR license, citing the detrimental effects on the community and the ongoing challenges posed by the rental.
Conversely, some residents defended the property owners, asserting that they have made efforts to comply with regulations and mitigate disturbances. Chad Waldorf, one of the owners, stated that they have reduced the number of rentable bedrooms and implemented measures to manage noise and guest behavior. He argued that granting the STR license would provide a framework for accountability and oversight.
The board members engaged in a lengthy discussion, weighing the concerns of the neighbors against the owners' compliance efforts. Some members expressed skepticism about the owners' ability to manage the property effectively, given its history of complaints. Others suggested that the ongoing issues reflect broader challenges associated with STRs in residential areas, particularly regarding community impact and the preservation of neighborhood character.
Ultimately, the board faced a decision on whether to approve the STR license, with several members indicating their inclination to deny it based on the significant community concerns raised. The meeting underscored the complexities of balancing property rights with the need to maintain the quality of life for full-time residents in the area.