During a recent city council meeting, resident Joanne Jones raised concerns regarding the rising costs associated with water bills and the allocation of funds for city projects. Jones specifically questioned Councilman Frank about his votes to increase water rates, which were justified by the need to address sewer issues, while also approving funding for beautification projects. She argued that prioritizing street and sewer improvements should take precedence over beautification efforts, suggesting that the funds could have been better utilized to address urgent infrastructure needs.

In response, Councilman Frank clarified that the funds for the Woodworth Boulevard beautification project were separate from the capital improvement budget designated for water and sewer repairs. He maintained that the city could manage both projects simultaneously, asserting that the beautification efforts would not detract from necessary infrastructure improvements.

Jones further criticized the city’s billing practices, highlighting charges for turning water service on and off, which she felt were excessive and confusing. She expressed frustration over the lack of communication regarding billing and service cutoffs, stating that residents often do not receive adequate notice before their water is shut off. The city manager defended the charges, explaining that they are necessary to cover the costs of service interruptions.

Jones concluded her remarks by drawing a historical parallel to the struggles of marginalized communities, emphasizing the need for transparency and fairness in the city's financial dealings with its residents. The meeting then transitioned to other agenda items, including a discussion on the status of the animal shelter project.