Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Proposed changes could unleash garage construction boom

October 10, 2024 | Prescott City, Yavapai County, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Proposed changes could unleash garage construction boom
In a recent government meeting, officials discussed proposed changes to the definition of gross floor area in relation to accessory structures, highlighting concerns over potential loopholes that could lead to oversized garages and accessory buildings in residential neighborhoods.

The current definition excludes certain areas, such as vehicle parking, from the gross floor area calculation. This has allowed homeowners to construct large accessory structures, like RV garages, without those spaces counting against the size limits imposed by local codes. For instance, a homeowner could have a principal residence of 2,500 square feet, including a 500-square-foot garage, while still being able to build an additional 2,000-square-foot RV garage, as the garage space is not included in the gross floor area calculation.

City staff expressed frustration over this loophole, noting that it has led to an increase in requests for large accessory garages, which can disrupt the character of residential neighborhoods. The proposed revision aims to clarify what counts towards the gross floor area, ensuring that accessory buildings do not exceed the size of principal buildings.

During the meeting, officials debated the implications of the changes, with some expressing concern that the new definition could inadvertently allow for larger accessory structures. They discussed the balance between limiting accessory building sizes and allowing homeowners the flexibility to build according to their needs.

The conversation also touched on the potential for \"garage mauls,\" where oversized garages could dominate residential properties, leading to community dissatisfaction. Officials acknowledged the need for a solution that addresses these concerns while maintaining reasonable limits on accessory structures.

As the discussion continues, city officials remain open to suggestions on how to effectively manage the size and impact of accessory buildings in residential areas, aiming to strike a balance between homeowner desires and community standards.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Arizona articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI