During a recent King County government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed ordinance on battery energy storage systems (BESS). Several residents voiced their opposition, highlighting potential risks associated with the installation of large-scale battery facilities in residential areas.

One speaker, who emphasized the importance of agriculture in the region, argued for the viability of farming over the expansion of electric infrastructure, urging the council to consider the implications of their decisions on local food supply. Bonnie Helms presented data on the failure rates of lithium battery systems, citing a report from the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) that documented 90 failures in less than 13 years, with a notable increase in incidents since 2021. Helms warned that the rapid growth of the battery storage industry has outpaced regulatory measures, leaving communities vulnerable to risks that are often downplayed by industry proponents.

Another resident, Sally McDonough, expressed alarm over the allowance of 2-megawatt battery units in residential zones, suggesting that such provisions could lead to significant safety hazards. She called for stricter regulations, including setbacks from schools and water sources, and criticized the current liability insurance requirements as inadequate for the potential risks involved.

The discussions reflect a growing apprehension among King County residents regarding the safety and regulatory oversight of battery storage facilities, as the council considers the future of energy infrastructure in the region. The meeting underscored the need for a thorough review of the implications of such projects, balancing energy needs with community safety and environmental concerns.