During a recent government meeting, Karen O'Cossey, representing the National Association of Colored People (NACP), raised significant concerns regarding the Pennsylvania School Boards Association's (PSBA) decision to bar Miss Harris from participating in discussions about an award named after a prominent black educator. O'Cossey criticized this action as a troubling indication of the PSBA's commitment to equity and inclusion, suggesting that it silences voices advocating for the recognition of black and brown individuals in education.

O'Cossey described the PSBA's decision as a \"modern-day lynching,\" arguing that it reflects a broader pattern of overlooking deserving candidates for awards intended to honor black pioneers. She questioned the criteria used for the award and highlighted inconsistencies in its distribution, noting that the first recipient was a black man serving on the board, while recent awards have gone to non-board members. This inconsistency raises concerns about the transparency and fairness of the selection process.

The discussion underscored the perception that the PSBA prioritizes maintaining the status quo over fostering an inclusive environment. O'Cossey emphasized that the act of barring Miss Harris not only dismisses her valid concerns but also sends a chilling message to others who might wish to speak out against injustice. She argued that the PSBA's actions serve as a hollow gesture of allyship, failing to engage in meaningful dialogue about representation and recognition within the organization.

The meeting concluded without addressing any further agenda items, leaving the implications of O'Cossey's statements lingering in the air as a call for reflection on the PSBA's practices and commitment to diversity.