During a recent government meeting, officials discussed the approval of an $80,897 bid from White House Painting for the repainting of the fiscal court building. The conversation centered around the color scheme, with various opinions on whether to match the building to the courthouse across the street or maintain its current color.

Committee members expressed a desire for the new paint to closely resemble the existing hue, acknowledging the challenges posed by ten years of fading. Some officials suggested that the peaks of the building could be painted white to align with the courthouse, while others pointed out that the current building features dark brown gutters and trim, complicating the matching process.

Magistrate Woosley emphasized the importance of distinguishing the fiscal court building from the courthouse to avoid confusion for visitors. He advocated for a color that would set the buildings apart, suggesting that maintaining a different color could enhance the identity of the fiscal court.

Several magistrates voiced their preference for the original taupe color, citing its classic and professional appearance. Concerns were raised about potential additional costs if the color were to change, particularly regarding the need for extra coats of paint and the painting of gutters and metal flashing, which were not included in the initial bid.

To address the differing opinions, it was proposed that an artist create visual representations of the building in various colors to facilitate a consensus among officials. The meeting concluded with a commitment to explore options that would refresh the building's appearance while considering the need for a cohesive identity.