Major changes approved for troubled Milton Elementary project
September 13, 2024 | CABELL COUNTY SCHOOLS, School Districts, West Virginia
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
In a recent government meeting, officials discussed significant updates regarding the Milton Elementary project, focusing on a series of change orders that have impacted the overall budget and timeline. The meeting highlighted the complexities involved in large-scale construction projects, particularly the unforeseen challenges that can arise.
The discussion began with an overview of the project's financial adjustments, specifically detailing four change orders. The first change order resulted in a credit of $566,000 due to value engineering decisions made during the design phase, which aimed to reduce costs by substituting materials. Subsequent change orders included a net credit of $70,000 and a $214,000 adjustment for necessary modifications, including the addition of a partition for special education purposes.
The most pressing issue discussed was change order number four, which amounted to $357,211. This adjustment was prompted by a slip in the grading at the back of the building, which was exacerbated by heavy rainfall. Geotechnical engineers were brought in to assess the situation, leading to a redesign of the slope to prevent further issues. The original plan would have cost approximately $500,000, but a more cost-effective solution was negotiated, resulting in a new contracted amount of $23,579,000.
Officials emphasized the importance of addressing these challenges promptly to ensure the project remains on track for a December completion, allowing students to transition into the new facility. Despite the adjustments, the project remains within a manageable overage of just 0.14% of the total budget, well below the typical threshold of 3%.
The meeting concluded with a recognition of the efforts made to keep costs down and the collaborative work between contractors and engineers to resolve issues efficiently. As the project progresses, officials remain committed to transparency and fiscal responsibility, ensuring that the Milton Elementary project meets its objectives without compromising quality or safety.
The discussion began with an overview of the project's financial adjustments, specifically detailing four change orders. The first change order resulted in a credit of $566,000 due to value engineering decisions made during the design phase, which aimed to reduce costs by substituting materials. Subsequent change orders included a net credit of $70,000 and a $214,000 adjustment for necessary modifications, including the addition of a partition for special education purposes.
The most pressing issue discussed was change order number four, which amounted to $357,211. This adjustment was prompted by a slip in the grading at the back of the building, which was exacerbated by heavy rainfall. Geotechnical engineers were brought in to assess the situation, leading to a redesign of the slope to prevent further issues. The original plan would have cost approximately $500,000, but a more cost-effective solution was negotiated, resulting in a new contracted amount of $23,579,000.
Officials emphasized the importance of addressing these challenges promptly to ensure the project remains on track for a December completion, allowing students to transition into the new facility. Despite the adjustments, the project remains within a manageable overage of just 0.14% of the total budget, well below the typical threshold of 3%.
The meeting concluded with a recognition of the efforts made to keep costs down and the collaborative work between contractors and engineers to resolve issues efficiently. As the project progresses, officials remain committed to transparency and fiscal responsibility, ensuring that the Milton Elementary project meets its objectives without compromising quality or safety.
View full meeting
This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.
View full meeting