In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the oversight of seabed mining operations in Papua New Guinea, particularly involving the company Magellan. Questions emerged about the presence of state officers on board their vessel, with officials noting that they were unaware of the vessel's current location and operations. The managing director of the Mineral Resources Authority acknowledged the need to address these concerns with the proponent.

Magellan has asserted that it possesses government approval for its activities, claiming to have the necessary resources and technologies to conduct safe exploration and mining. However, environmental advocates, including Jonathan Mesulam, have challenged this assertion, highlighting the absence of a regulatory framework governing seabed mining in the country. Mesulam emphasized the potential long-term impacts on local fisheries and coastal communities, warning that deep-sea mining could lead to irreversible consequences.

Allan Byrd, another environmental advocate, cautioned against proceeding with mining operations without a solid legal framework, stressing the importance of responsible practices not only in Papua New Guinea but globally. In response to the ongoing scrutiny, Magellan and the Deep Sea Mining Finance (DSMF) have stated they will await a thorough analysis of the geological samples before making further decisions.

As the debate continues, the future of seabed mining in Papua New Guinea remains uncertain, with many questioning whether the potential economic benefits can outweigh the risks to the environment and local livelihoods.