In a recent government meeting, the Planning Commission discussed a proposal for the removal of a heritage tree to facilitate the construction of a detached carport and a new two-story single-family residence with an attached accessory dwelling unit (ADU) at a vacant property. The property, which has been vacant since a fire in June 2015, currently features only remnants of the original home's foundation.

The applicant is seeking to remove a 20-inch Coast Live Oak tree to accommodate the carport, but has also presented two alternative designs that would allow for the carport's construction without removing the tree. The first alternative involves a layout that maintains a relationship with the garage and driveway, while the second would approach the garage from the west side of the property, impacting a total of seven trees.

Town arborist Sally Bentz expressed her opposition to the removal of the heritage tree, stating that it is not dead or dangerous and that its slight lean does not pose a significant risk. The Commission raised concerns about the proximity of the tree to the proposed new residence, particularly regarding potential overhang issues as the tree matures.

The discussion highlighted the importance of preserving the tree, with several commissioners noting that the tree's removal could set a precedent for future developments in the area. The applicant emphasized their commitment to the community and their intention to plant additional trees if the removal is approved.

Ultimately, the Commission voted to approve the tree removal permit, contingent upon the approval of a staff exception for the carport, and mandated that the applicant plant two 48-inch box oak trees as compensation for the removal of the heritage tree. The decision reflects a balance between the applicant's needs for parking and the community's desire to preserve its natural landscape.