In a recent forum hosted by the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah, panelists engaged in a lively discussion regarding Constitutional Amendment A, which will appear on Utah's ballot this November. The amendment proposes to remove the earmark on state income tax that currently restricts its use to public education, higher education, and services for children and individuals with disabilities.

The forum, held in partnership with the Better Utah Institute and the Utah Taxpayers Association, featured a diverse panel of experts, including Renee Pinkney, president of the Utah Education Association; Billy Hesterman, president of the Utah Taxpayers Association; Moe Hickey, executive director of Voices for Utah Children; and Kevin Green, Utah state director for Americans for Prosperity. The discussion was moderated by Lara Jones of KRCL.

Pinkney opened the conversation by expressing opposition to Amendment A, labeling it a \"power grab\" by the legislature that could lead to increased funding for private religious school vouchers. She voiced concerns that lifting the income tax earmark would open the door for state funds to be diverted to \"politician pet projects,\" undermining the financial support currently allocated to public education.

The panelists were tasked with presenting their perspectives on the implications of the amendment, which, if passed, would allow state lawmakers to reallocate income tax revenues while promising to eliminate the state portion of the sales tax on food. This promise has raised questions about the potential impact on public education funding and the broader implications for Utah's tax policy.

As the forum progressed, audience members were encouraged to engage with the panelists and explore the various viewpoints surrounding this significant amendment. The discussions highlighted the ongoing debate over education funding in Utah and the potential consequences of changing the state's tax structure.