During a recent council meeting, members expressed frustration over ongoing issues with the county's handling of flood-related problems, particularly concerning waterline maintenance and road erosion. Councilman Munoz highlighted the county's failure to address these issues despite the city paying $118,000 for what he described as inadequate responses. He emphasized that the county has a responsibility to manage flooding impacts, as they receive funding for such emergencies, while the city does not.

Council members discussed the lengthy and costly process of obtaining necessary permits from the county, which often leads to no tangible results. Munoz pointed out that the community has been waiting for action on these matters for years, warning that further delays could lead to future emergencies.

Mayor and other council members echoed Munoz's sentiments, stressing the need for accountability from the county. They urged city officials to engage with county representatives to ensure that responsibilities are met and that citizens are adequately represented.

Additionally, the council raised concerns about the reliance on a single contractor, Enova, for city projects. Questions were posed regarding the lack of competition and whether the city was receiving the best deals. The discussion highlighted the need for a broader approach to contracting to ensure fair opportunities for local businesses.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between city and county responsibilities, with council members advocating for more proactive measures to address community needs and improve collaboration between the two entities.