In a recent city council meeting, heated discussions emerged surrounding the controversial Ordinance 3288, which regulates short-term rentals (STR) in Auburn. Residents expressed frustration over perceived violations of property and constitutional rights, claiming that the ordinance has led to significant financial losses for families reliant on STR income.

One resident accused the council members, referred to as the \"STR 5,\" of neglecting the needs of the community by passing the ordinance, which they argue is based on discriminatory zoning practices. The speaker highlighted that 80% of STR income in the area is generated from just ten major events, including home football games and graduations, suggesting that the local hotel industry cannot meet the demand during these peak times.

Critics also pointed to a lack of accountability, alleging that the mayor should have recused himself from voting on the ordinance due to conflicts of interest, particularly referencing a former council member who did so. The resident proposed an amendment to the ordinance that would allow all zoning to be open to STRs, provided homeowners can prove their primary residence status, while those with multiple properties would be classified as commercial STRs.

Another resident, Susan Bolt, raised concerns about a perceived double standard in enforcement, citing a property owned by the mayor's campaign manager that allegedly operates as a short-term rental in a prohibited zone. This claim prompted a tense exchange between Bolt and the mayor, who denied any connection to the campaign manager.

The discussions reflect ongoing tensions in Auburn regarding STR regulations, with residents calling for more equitable enforcement and a reevaluation of the current zoning laws to better accommodate community needs.