In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the actions of a local water board and its handling of a multimillion-dollar drainage improvement project. Landowners expressed frustration over the board's decision to proceed with construction without holding a required vote, despite a Supreme Court ruling that deemed such actions unauthorized.

The meeting highlighted a letter sent by landowners' attorneys in August 2022, which indicated that litigation would cease if a vote was conducted. However, the board moved forward with construction, ignoring the potential legal ramifications. The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in December confirmed that the board had exceeded its authority by not allowing landowner input, specifically regarding the maximum levy and the timeline for maintenance.

Landowners voiced their discontent, arguing that the board's refusal to take responsibility for its actions has left them financially liable for unauthorized bonds. They expressed concern over proposed legislation that could further diminish their voting rights by increasing the maximum maintenance levy from $4 to $8 per acre and extending the levy timeframe from six to ten years. Such changes could effectively eliminate the need for future landowner votes on significant projects.

Paul Matthews, a landowner and one of the defendants in the ongoing dispute, shared his personal experiences with the water board, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability. He called for a straightforward vote on the project, stating that the process could have been resolved quickly if the board had engaged with landowners earlier.

The meeting concluded with a call for legislative action to clarify the voting process and ensure that landowners have a say in projects that directly impact their finances. As the committee adjourned, members acknowledged the complexity of water management issues and the importance of continued dialogue to address these challenges.