In a recent government meeting, council members deliberated on the proposed mural for Moondog Growlers, ultimately deciding to deny the application. The discussion highlighted concerns regarding the mural's compliance with existing signage regulations and its visibility from the primary entrance of the establishment.

Council members expressed that the mural, while not offensive, did not align with the city’s guidelines for signage. One member pointed out that the mural could potentially be classified as a sign, which would require adherence to specific size limitations and regulations. The council emphasized the need for the business to either revise the mural to meet mural guidelines or pursue it as a sign, which would involve consulting the planning and development department.

The council also noted that the business owners were not present at the meeting, raising questions about their awareness of the discussion. Despite the absence, the council agreed on the importance of providing clear options for the business moving forward, including the possibility of applying for a variance if they wished to proceed with the mural as proposed.

The motion to decline the mural application was passed, with one council member abstaining from the vote. The council concluded the meeting by inviting public comments before adjourning.