During a recent government meeting, council members discussed the upcoming budget, highlighting both support and concerns regarding various funding allocations. Council member White commended the staff for their efforts in preparing the budget, expressing optimism about its passage.

Council member Castillo raised specific concerns regarding funding for UT Health, noting that the budget for 2026 does not include support for the following year. Castillo emphasized the need to prioritize essential services, particularly children's access to dental care, while also acknowledging the importance of cultural events like the Cesar Chavez March, which is set to receive a $200,000 increase over two years.

The discussion also touched on the Urban Tree Canopy program, which Castillo noted is currently out of funds. She expressed gratitude for the potential support it may receive in the new budget, as it plays a crucial role in addressing residents' concerns.

A significant point of contention arose regarding the reproductive justice fund. Castillo sought clarification on a previously mentioned $400,000 earmark that was not reflected in the current budget proposal. Staff clarified that there had been a miscommunication during a special session, leading to confusion about the availability of these funds. Castillo expressed frustration over the misinformation, highlighting the urgency of getting funds distributed effectively.

Overall, the meeting underscored the balancing act of addressing immediate community needs while navigating budgetary constraints, with council members advocating for transparency and prioritization of essential services.