In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the ongoing legal and environmental concerns surrounding the installation of an artificial sports field. A temporary restraining order was issued on October 5, halting the installation until a court hearing scheduled for October 15. This order was prompted by community opposition, and both the town and its opponents will present evidence to the judge during the hearing.

The discussion also highlighted concerns regarding PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), a group of chemicals linked to environmental and health risks. Some committee members expressed frustration over the perceived inconsistency in the town's stance on PFAS, questioning why the project was still moving forward despite these concerns.

Research presented during the meeting indicated that the artificial field would contain negligible levels of PFAS—approximately four parts per trillion—compared to existing environmental levels, which can reach up to 175 parts per trillion. Committee members argued that if children are not allowed to play on the new field, they would likely use older fields that may have higher PFAS levels.

Several officials emphasized the importance of educating themselves on the issue, asserting that the new field would not pose a significant risk to children. They expressed confidence in the safety of the installation, urging the community to consider the broader context of PFAS contamination in the environment. The meeting concluded with a commitment to provide updates following the upcoming court hearing, as stakeholders await further developments on the artificial field project.