During a recent government meeting, community members voiced concerns regarding a proposed expansion of a sand mine operated by the University of Georgia. The expansion would increase the mining area by 25 acres, adding to the existing 48 acres already approved for commercial use. Residents expressed worries about the environmental impact, particularly the depletion of local water resources and the potential dangers posed to children in the area.

One resident, Gracie, highlighted the adverse effects of the mining on her family’s three ponds, which have suffered from reduced water levels since mining operations began in 2020. She reported spending over $1,000 monthly to maintain a deep water well to keep the ponds stocked with fish, emphasizing the personal toll the mining has taken on her family's enjoyment of the land.

Greg Gildark sought clarification on the nature of the mining operation, confirming it is commercial in purpose. He also inquired about the timeline for the expansion, which officials indicated is not expected to continue indefinitely.

Julie Perry raised questions about the zoning classification of the property, specifically the implications of the Planned Development/Mining Reclamation (PDMR) designation. Officials reassured her that this zoning is specifically tailored for mining reclamation and would revert to agricultural zoning once mining is completed.

Larissa Knight, a long-time opponent of the sand mine, reiterated her concerns about safety and environmental degradation, particularly regarding the potential for children to access the mining area. She questioned the appropriateness of the PDMR zoning, suggesting it could lead to future developments that might not align with community interests.

County officials clarified that existing covenants on the property would limit future uses to mining and forestry, preventing any residential or industrial development. They emphasized that these covenants would take precedence over county zoning regulations.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between community concerns and the university's need for revenue from the mining operation, as well as the complexities of land use regulations in the area. As discussions continue, residents remain vigilant about the potential impacts of the expansion on their environment and quality of life.